Avaliações PREreview de “An Inception Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies are Published”

Ir para detalhes do preprint Ir para avaliações PREreview

An Inception Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies are Published

de Eline Noëlle Fleur Ensinck e Daniel Lakens

Publicado: 2 de junho de 2023
Servidor: PsyArXiv
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/5hkjz

Resumo

We quantified how many studies registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) up to November 2017 are performed but not shared after at least 4 years. Examining a sample of 169 registered research studies we found that 104 (61.5%) were publicly shared. We estimate that 5316 out of 9172 (58%) registered studies on the OSF are publicly shared. Researchers use registries to make unpublished studies public, and the OSF policy to open registrations after a four year embargo substantially increases the number of studies that become known to the scientific community. In responses to emails asking researchers why studies remained unpublished logistical issues (e.g., lack of time, researchers changing jobs) were the most common cause, followed by null results, and rejections during peer review. Our exploratory study shows that a substantial amount of studies that researchers perform remain unpublished.

Ler o preprint

1 Avaliação PREreview

Escrever uma Avaliação PREreview Solicitar uma Avaliação PREreview

Avaliação PREreview de Olmo R. van den Akker

De autoria de Olmo R. van den Akker

Review of the manuscript “An Inception Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies are Published” submitted to Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Authors: Eline Ensinck & Daniel Lakens
Reviewer: Olmo van den Akker
In this manuscript, the authors present an inception…

Ler a avaliação PREreview de Olmo R. van den Akker

Avaliações PREreview de An Inception Cohort Study Quantifying How Many Registered Studies are Published

1 Avaliação PREreview