Aller directement au contenu principal

Rédiger un PREreview

To Lay a Stone with Six Birds: Finite-State Semantics for Packaging, Directionality, and Coarse-Graining

Publié
Serveur de preprints
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202602.1699.v1

Work on multi-scale organization and audit-based directionality lacks a minimal-substrate theorem: key primitives are often realized only by smuggling in external schedules, ad hoc audits, or declared quotients, making results hard to verify and compare across substrates. We introduce a no-smuggling minimal-substrate semantics for SPT, operationalize it via matched-control audit tests on finite stochastic machines, and demonstrate separations between protocol artifacts, intrinsic drive, and route-dependent packaging defects. Operationally, we define a canonical machine class \( \mathcal S_{\min} \) of autonomous finite stochastic dynamics with phase-in-state, deterministic lenses, induced packaging endomaps \( E_{\tau,f} \), and intrinsic audits (path-reversal KL asymmetry \( \Sigma_T \) and ACC affinities), and we implement exact computations together with a reproducible witness suite and a Lean-checked idempotent/closure backbone for packaging equivalence and saturation (de Moura and Ullrich 2021; The mathlib Community 2020). Under calibrated controls, stroboscopic protocols can exhibit \( \Sigma_T>0 \) while their autonomous lifts yield \( \Sigma_T\approx 0 \) (protocol trap), whereas turning on internal phase drive produces a clean null-vs-driven separation with \( \Sigma_T(Z)>0 \) and a detectable projected macro arrow; moreover deterministic coarse-graining never increases \( \Sigma_T \) and can erase it entirely, and packaging along refinement routes exhibits a prototype-driven holonomy defect that is large at moderate timescales while a uniform baseline is near zero and satisfies a gain-plus-mismatch bound. These results supply a machine semantics and separation witnesses for a minimal substrate theorem, reducing false positives and turning SPT from a language into a compilation target up to packaging equivalence. We are explicit that we do not establish a universal physical substrate or continuum limit: our conclusions are semantic and rest on exact finite-state audits and controlled constructions rather than empirical natural-system data.

Vous pouvez rédiger un PREreview de To Lay a Stone with Six Birds: Finite-State Semantics for Packaging, Directionality, and Coarse-Graining. Un PREreview est une évaluation d'un preprint et peut varier de quelques phrases à un rapport détaillé, semblable à un rapport d'évaluation par les pairs organisé par une revue.

Avant de commencer

Nous vous demanderons de vous connecter avec votre identifiant ORCID iD. Si vous n'en avez pas, vous pouvez en créer un.

Qu’est-ce qu’un ORCID iD ?

Un ORCID iD est un identifiant unique qui vous distingue de toute personne ayant le même nom ou nom similaire.

Commencer maintenant