Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

To Lay a Stone with Six Birds: Finite-State Semantics for Packaging, Directionality, and Coarse-Graining

Posted
Server
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202602.1699.v1

Work on multi-scale organization and audit-based directionality lacks a minimal-substrate theorem: key primitives are often realized only by smuggling in external schedules, ad hoc audits, or declared quotients, making results hard to verify and compare across substrates. We introduce a no-smuggling minimal-substrate semantics for SPT, operationalize it via matched-control audit tests on finite stochastic machines, and demonstrate separations between protocol artifacts, intrinsic drive, and route-dependent packaging defects. Operationally, we define a canonical machine class \( \mathcal S_{\min} \) of autonomous finite stochastic dynamics with phase-in-state, deterministic lenses, induced packaging endomaps \( E_{\tau,f} \), and intrinsic audits (path-reversal KL asymmetry \( \Sigma_T \) and ACC affinities), and we implement exact computations together with a reproducible witness suite and a Lean-checked idempotent/closure backbone for packaging equivalence and saturation (de Moura and Ullrich 2021; The mathlib Community 2020). Under calibrated controls, stroboscopic protocols can exhibit \( \Sigma_T>0 \) while their autonomous lifts yield \( \Sigma_T\approx 0 \) (protocol trap), whereas turning on internal phase drive produces a clean null-vs-driven separation with \( \Sigma_T(Z)>0 \) and a detectable projected macro arrow; moreover deterministic coarse-graining never increases \( \Sigma_T \) and can erase it entirely, and packaging along refinement routes exhibits a prototype-driven holonomy defect that is large at moderate timescales while a uniform baseline is near zero and satisfies a gain-plus-mismatch bound. These results supply a machine semantics and separation witnesses for a minimal substrate theorem, reducing false positives and turning SPT from a language into a compilation target up to packaging equivalence. We are explicit that we do not establish a universal physical substrate or continuum limit: our conclusions are semantic and rest on exact finite-state audits and controlled constructions rather than empirical natural-system data.

You can write a PREreview of To Lay a Stone with Six Birds: Finite-State Semantics for Packaging, Directionality, and Coarse-Graining. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now