PREreview estructurada del Religion of Revolution: An inquiry into Ali Shariati's Redefinition of Islam as a Catalyst for Social and Political Change

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?

Partly

research gap in not explicit

Are the methods well-suited for this research?

Somewhat appropriate

it was so good a little relies on secondary resources method is not explicit. diversity spectrum between hegel, ibn arabi, etc is not related well to each other

Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Somewhat supported

as a normal narrative review is not bad some claims and quotations are scattered

Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?

I don’t know

How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?

Somewhat clearly

While it is useful to distinguish between Shariati's critical edge and his constructive proposals, the author would benefit from further exploring an important discursive nuance. Given his background, Shariati leaned significantly on literary rhetoric, and it was precisely his charismatic oratory—far more than his textual corpus—that captured popular attention. However, despite this popular influence, it was the Islamic fundamentalist faction that ultimately assumed social leadership and steered the revolutionary outcome. maybe at the other chance, some other local experts could help you more

Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?

Not likely

Would it benefit from language editing?

Yes

somewhat readability is so hard because of authors relying on Ms Office spell checker. it needs native check

Would you recommend this preprint to others?

Yes, but it needs to be improved

it is good as an essay not really as research paper

Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?

Yes, after minor changes

as essay template, yes. i suggest to follow periodical conference about shariati. they would be attractive about this work

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.