Skip to main content

Write a comment

Structured PREreview of Religion of Revolution: An inquiry into Ali Shariati's Redefinition of Islam as a Catalyst for Social and Political Change

Published
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21159533
License
CC BY 4.0
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
Partly
research gap in not explicit
Are the methods well-suited for this research?
Somewhat appropriate
it was so good a little relies on secondary resources method is not explicit. diversity spectrum between hegel, ibn arabi, etc is not related well to each other
Are the conclusions supported by the data?
Somewhat supported
as a normal narrative review is not bad some claims and quotations are scattered
Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
I don’t know
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
Somewhat clearly
While it is useful to distinguish between Shariati's critical edge and his constructive proposals, the author would benefit from further exploring an important discursive nuance. Given his background, Shariati leaned significantly on literary rhetoric, and it was precisely his charismatic oratory—far more than his textual corpus—that captured popular attention. However, despite this popular influence, it was the Islamic fundamentalist faction that ultimately assumed social leadership and steered the revolutionary outcome. maybe at the other chance, some other local experts could help you more
Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
Not likely
Would it benefit from language editing?
Yes
somewhat readability is so hard because of authors relying on Ms Office spell checker. it needs native check
Would you recommend this preprint to others?
Yes, but it needs to be improved
it is good as an essay not really as research paper
Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
Yes, after minor changes
as essay template, yes. i suggest to follow periodical conference about shariati. they would be attractive about this work

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.

You can write a comment on this PREreview of Religion of Revolution: An inquiry into Ali Shariati's Redefinition of Islam as a Catalyst for Social and Political Change.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now