Write a comment

Structured PREreview of Inteligência Artificial e Políticas Editoriais de revistas científicas

by Luis M. Montilla

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?: Yes; El objetivo es enunciado claramente al final de la introducción, incluyendo la delimitación geográfica, tipo de muestra colectado, y la base de datos usados
Are the methods well-suited for this research?: Somewhat appropriate; La descripción de los métodos se beneficiaría de algunos detalles adicionales sobre los criterios de selección de las revistas.
Are the conclusions supported by the data?: Somewhat supported; Hay un sentido de urgencia en las conclusiones que podría ser matizado. La incorporación de GenAI a las prácticas editoriales sigue siendo relativamente reciente y en constante examen, sin embargo es indudablemente una valiosa contribución.
Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?: Somewhat appropriate and clear
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?: Somewhat clearly
Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?: Highly likely
Would it benefit from language editing?: No
Would you recommend this preprint to others?: Yes, it’s of high quality
Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?: Yes, after minor changes

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.

You can write a comment on this PREreview of Inteligência Artificial e Políticas Editoriais de revistas científicas.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.