Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Distinct Working Memory for Near and Far in a T-Maze Delayed Alternation Task

Posted
Server
bioRxiv
DOI
10.64898/2026.07.30.741937

Working memory has been considered a delay-dependent retention system, but variability in delay duration across species and tasks suggests that task-intrinsic factors may also contribute. Here, we investigated the effects of delay duration (75 s vs. 150 s) and task distance (0 m vs. 2 m) on working memory using a T-maze delayed alternation task with a movable home-cage apparatus in rats. At the 150-s delay, accuracy was 9% lower at 0 m than at 2 m (75% vs. 84%), with a similar numerical tendency observed at the 75-s delay (4% lower). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of both task distance and delay duration, with no significant interaction (p = 0.217). Post hoc pairwise comparisons indicated that accuracy in the 0-m condition was significantly lower at 150 s than at 75 s (adjusted p = 0.038). At the 150-s delay, accuracy was also significantly lower in the 0-m condition than in the 2-m condition (adjusted p = 0.019). These results suggest that working memory retention is influenced not only by temporal constraints but also by task-intrinsic factors such as task distance, with the observed effects appearing independent and consistent with a two-factor framework.

You can write a PREreview of Distinct Working Memory for Near and Far in a T-Maze Delayed Alternation Task. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now