Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Too Soon to Dismiss? A Reanalysis of Forster and Neugebauer (2024) Highlighting the Role of Effect Heterogeneity in Evaluating Factorial Surveys

Posted
Server
SocArXiv
DOI
10.31235/osf.io/zk2ar_v2

This replication study critically examines the findings and conclusions of Forster and Neugebauer (2024), who question the external validity of factorial surveys in capturing real-world behavior. Using the publicly available data from the original study, we reassess the effects of educational signals and ethnic origin. Our analyses show that the original results do not withstand all robustness checks and that theoretically derived effect heterogeneities across occupational fields provide more nuanced explanations. These findings challenge the general claim that factorial surveys are unsuitable for studying hiring processes and instead underscore the importance of context-sensitive modeling. We argue that factorial surveys remain a valuable methodological tool, particularly when heterogeneity is explicitly addressed in both design and analysis.

You can write a PREreview of Too Soon to Dismiss? A Reanalysis of Forster and Neugebauer (2024) Highlighting the Role of Effect Heterogeneity in Evaluating Factorial Surveys. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now