Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Empirical Spatial Divergence and Heavy-Tail Error Analysis of FMCW Radar vs. LiDAR in Unstructured Traffic

Posted
Server
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202605.0657.v1

This paper quantifies the spatial divergence between 128-channel Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds and Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar tracks in high-clutter urban environments using the TiAND dataset. Nearest-neighbor Euclidean distance between radar target centers and raw LiDAR geometry serves as the error metric, chosen because the dataset provides no semantic bounding-box annotations. Across all processed frames the system produced an RMSE of 10.083 m with a median error (P50) of 1.157 m, while the 99th-percentile (P99) deviation reached 43.008 m with the single worst-case ghost target exceeded 217 m. A total of 4,113 detections crossed the 15 m catastrophic threshold—a figure that must be interpreted against the full detection population reported in Section III. Critically, the top anomalies cluster across consecutive frames near fixed infrastructure suggesting persistent multi-path reflection geometry rather than isolated single-frame noise. These findings indicate that raw FMCW radar output without downstream filtering or LiDAR verification cannot be relied upon for spatial localization in unstructured urban traffic.

You can write a PREreview of Empirical Spatial Divergence and Heavy-Tail Error Analysis of FMCW Radar vs. LiDAR in Unstructured Traffic. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now