الانتقال إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

اكتب مراجعة على PREreview

To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey

نُشر
الخادم
SocArXiv
DOI
10.31235/osf.io/k7reb

Open science is receiving widespread attention globally, and preprinting offers an important way to implement open science practices in scholarly publishing. To develop a systematic understanding of researchers’ adoption of and attitudes toward preprinting, we conducted a survey of authors of research papers published in 2021 and early 2022. Our survey results show that the US and Europe lead the way in the adoption of preprinting. US and European respondents reported a higher familiarity with and a stronger commitment to preprinting than their colleagues elsewhere in the world. The adoption of preprinting is much stronger in physics and astronomy as well as mathematics and computer science than in other research areas. Respondents identified free accessibility of preprints and acceleration of research communication as the most important benefits of preprinting. Low reliability and credibility of preprints, sharing results before peer review and premature media coverage are the most significant concerns about preprinting, emphasized in particular by respondents in the life and health sciences. According to respondents, the most crucial strategies to encourage preprinting are integrating preprinting into journal submission workflows and providing recognition for posting preprints.

يمكنك كتابة مراجعة PREreview لـ To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey. مراجعة PREreview هي مراجعة لمسودة بحثية أولية، ويمكن أن تتراوح بين بضع جمل وتقرير مطوّل، على غرار تقرير مراجعة الأقران الذي تنظمه المجلات العلمية.

قبل أن تبدأ

سنطلب منك تسجيل الدخول باستخدام معرّف ORCID الخاص بك. إذا لم يكن لديك معرّف، يمكنك إنشاء واحد.

ما هو معرّف ORCID؟

يُعدّ معرّف ORCID معرّفًا فريدًا يميّزك عن كل من يحمل اسمًا مطابقًا أو مشابهًا لاسمك.

ابدأ الآن