Ir para o conteúdo principal

Escrever uma avaliação PREreview

To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey

Publicado
Servidor
SocArXiv
DOI
10.31235/osf.io/k7reb

Open science is receiving widespread attention globally, and preprinting offers an important way to implement open science practices in scholarly publishing. To develop a systematic understanding of researchers’ adoption of and attitudes toward preprinting, we conducted a survey of authors of research papers published in 2021 and early 2022. Our survey results show that the US and Europe lead the way in the adoption of preprinting. US and European respondents reported a higher familiarity with and a stronger commitment to preprinting than their colleagues elsewhere in the world. The adoption of preprinting is much stronger in physics and astronomy as well as mathematics and computer science than in other research areas. Respondents identified free accessibility of preprints and acceleration of research communication as the most important benefits of preprinting. Low reliability and credibility of preprints, sharing results before peer review and premature media coverage are the most significant concerns about preprinting, emphasized in particular by respondents in the life and health sciences. According to respondents, the most crucial strategies to encourage preprinting are integrating preprinting into journal submission workflows and providing recognition for posting preprints.

Você pode escrever uma avaliação PREreview de To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey. Uma avaliação PREreview é uma avaliação de um preprint e pode variar de algumas frases a um parecer extenso, semelhante a um parecer de revisão por pares realizado por periódicos.

Antes de começar

Vamos pedir que você faça login com seu ORCID iD. Se você não tiver um iD, pode criar um.

O que é um ORCID iD?

Um ORCID iD é um identificador único que diferencia você de outras pessoas com o mesmo nome ou nome semelhante.

Começar agora