Structured PREreview of Genome-wide consensus transcriptional signatures identify synaptic pruning linking Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy
- Published
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.15682703
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
- Yes
- It described the need, importance and the reason for the study.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
- Highly appropriate
- The methods were well detailed
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
- Somewhat supported
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
- Highly inappropriate or unclear
- There was no data presentation as visuals, etc. in the article, except it was kept in another place
- How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
- Somewhat clearly
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
- Highly likely
- It is an area that, if advanced, will help in healthcare promotion.
- Would it benefit from language editing?
- No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
- Yes, but it needs to be improved
- Data should be presented using various visual aids. It should provide more detailed explanations to enable scholars from different fields to learn easily.
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
- Yes, after minor changes
- Results and discussion
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.