Structured PREreview of Genome-wide consensus transcriptional signatures identify synaptic pruning linking Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?: Yes; It described the need, importance and the reason for the study.
Are the methods well-suited for this research?: Highly appropriate; The methods were well detailed
Are the conclusions supported by the data?: Somewhat supported
Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?: Highly inappropriate or unclear; There was no data presentation as visuals, etc. in the article, except it was kept in another place
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?: Somewhat clearly
Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?: Highly likely; It is an area that, if advanced, will help in healthcare promotion.
Would it benefit from language editing?: No
Would you recommend this preprint to others?: Yes, but it needs to be improved; Data should be presented using various visual aids. It should provide more detailed explanations to enable scholars from different fields to learn easily.
Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?: Yes, after minor changes; Results and discussion

Competing interests