Write a comment

Structured PREreview of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) competency retention among registered nurses in critical care versus general care unit

by Roshani Karunarathne

Published: November 13, 2023
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10117156
License: CC BY 4.0

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?: Yes; The introduction explains the objective. However, it would be better if the introduction could be shortened.
Are the methods well-suited for this research?: Somewhat appropriate; There is a lack of a control group.
Are the conclusions supported by the data?: Highly supported
Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?: Somewhat appropriate and clear; A graphical representation would be better.
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?: Neither clearly nor unclearly
Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?: Somewhat likely
Would it benefit from language editing?: No
Would you recommend this preprint to others?: Yes, but it needs to be improved
Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?: Yes, as it is

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

You can write a comment on this PREreview of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) competency retention among registered nurses in critical care versus general care unit.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.