Avalilação PREreview Estruturada de FitGym: An Online Smart GYM Platform

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?

Yes

Are the methods well-suited for this research?

Somewhat appropriate

The software architecture is stated, but more important datasets like the inclusion and exclusion criteria, training and validation of the AI-generated plans, and ground truth labelling procedure are missing or not very clearly stated. The yoga pose detection is the main differentiating factor stated in this program, but it does not differentiate whether a pose is biomechanically correct or not. The study can include expert annotation reference postures

Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Somewhat supported

Claims on user engagement, retention, completion of the health goals, personalisation of the health program, overall effectiveness of the program and improved health need more empharical data

Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?

Somewhat appropriate and clear

The data presentations are partially appropriate in terms of architecture, functional modules and implementation. But it needs more in-depth visualisation of the AI performance results using statistical information

How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?

Somewhat clearly

Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?

Moderately likely

The integration of AI into a health monitoring platform will add value to the user, but from an academic standpoint, it is more of an integration into a health platform that might not have any novel value. In future based on more detailed results from test users and datasets, this might give us an understanding of how user welcome such intiative and adapt to it to help in achieving their health goals

Would it benefit from language editing?

No

Would you recommend this preprint to others?

Yes, but it needs to be improved

Stronger scientific methodology, technical validation, and evidence. Also, users' medical status, like comorbidities and body composition (apart from BMI), is not present

Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?

Yes, after minor changes

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.