- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Somewhat appropriate
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Neither supported nor unsupported
- The paper is conceptual and not data driven
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Neither appropriate and clear nor inappropriate and unclear
- It focuses more on conceptual framing, case studies, and architectural discussions.
- How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
-
Very clearly
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Moderately likely
- Yes, advances knowledge conceptually but not strongly empirical
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, but it needs to be improved
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, after minor changes
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.