- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- The introduction explains the objective of this study by giving detailed information about other studies and at the end of the section thoroughly explaining the methodology followed.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Highly appropriate
- The authors provide details about the materials used in the study and the methodology which was followed.
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Highly supported
- The conclusions are supported by the data, which in the results and discussion sections, are presented compared and analysed thoroughly.
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Highly appropriate and clear
- All data representations are correctly used, easily conveying their meaning to the reader.
- How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
-
Very clearly
- The authors effectively communicate their findings and future next steps.
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Highly likely
- The preprint significantly contributes to the academic literature, as it demonstrates a novel method in addressing a challenging task.
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, it’s of high quality
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, as it is
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.