Ir para o conteúdo principal

Escrever uma avaliação PREreview

Evidence Graph Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Model-Dependent Analysis of Hallucination Detection

Publicado
Servidor
arXiv
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2606.06748

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination in large language models. Existing detection methods rely on flat similarity between generated answers and retrieved passages, ignoring structural relationships among evidence pieces and answer claims. We propose Evidence Graph Consistency (EGC), a framework that constructs a local evidence graph per response and computes five structural consistency measures as hallucination indicators. Evaluated on the full question answering split of RAGTruth across six LLMs (5,767 responses), EGC reveals a consistent model-family split: graph consistency features show the expected diagnostic direction for hallucinations in Llama-2 models but exhibit systematic reversal in GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Mistral-7B. This reversal suggests qualitatively different hallucination patterns across model families and indicates that embedding-based graph consistency cannot serve as a model-independent hallucination detection signal.

Você pode escrever uma avaliação PREreview de Evidence Graph Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Model-Dependent Analysis of Hallucination Detection. Uma avaliação PREreview é uma avaliação de um preprint e pode variar de algumas frases a um parecer extenso, semelhante a um parecer de revisão por pares realizado por periódicos.

Antes de começar

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Começar agora