Écrire un commentaire

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?

Yes

The objectives were well stated

Are the methods well-suited for this research?

Somewhat appropriate

The methods are not explicit enough The criteria are not clearly determined, neither are the methods clearly described.

Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Highly supported

Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?

Highly appropriate and clear

It's possible to add more visualization aids

How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?

Very clearly

The conclusion gave more clarity to the results

Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?

Highly likely

Would it benefit from language editing?

No

Would you recommend this preprint to others?

Yes, but it needs to be improved

Avoid repetitions, make it more concise Rephrase the title, make it more informative

Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?

Yes, after minor changes

New title and more concise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.