This paper presents a detailed derivation for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, often termed the g-2 anomaly, from the foundational principles of the Helix-Light-Vortex (HLV) theory. It proposes that this persistent discrepancy between the Standard Model and experimental results is not a sign of undiscovered particles, but rather a direct consequence of the geometric structure of spacetime itself. The paper's central thesis is that the anomaly can be calculated as a necessary geometric correction arising from the unique way HLV models time and space. This provides a new physical interpretation for one of the most significant tensions in modern particle physics.
The core mechanism is described as an "information back-reaction," where a retrocausal information field (Φ_U2) influences the forward-evolving physical field of the muon (Ψ_U1). This interaction is formally modeled through a dynamic effective metric, which subtly alters the geometry of spacetime through which the muon's spin precesses. The paper derives the magnitude of this geometric correction term from first principles, using only fundamental constants like the fine-structure constant and the geometric radii of the muon and proton as defined within the HLV model. This derivation requires no new particles or arbitrary free parameters. A final time-averaging process of the effect introduces a factor of 1/π to arrive at the predicted observable value.
The resulting theoretical value for the anomaly is shown to be in precise agreement with the latest experimental measurements from the Fermilab Muon g-2 collaboration. This supports the conclusion that the g-2 anomaly is a signature of new, fundamental spacetime physics. Furthermore, the paper positions this result as a potential "arbiter" in the ongoing theoretical debate between the data-driven R-ratio method and the newer lattice QCD calculations for the Standard Model prediction. By providing a physical reason for the discrepancy found by the R-ratio approach, the HLV framework offers a resolution to the tension between the two theoretical camps. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the precise agreement between its derivation and the experimental data provides strong support for the HLV framework as a viable candidate for physics beyond the Standard Model.