Aller directement au contenu principal

Rédiger un PREreview

No evidence that positive outcomes elicit a stronger sense of agency once correcting for publication bias: a commentary on, and re-analysis of, Mariano et al. (2025)

Publié
Serveur de preprints
PsyArXiv
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/wkcgf_v5

In a recent meta-analysis, Mariano et al. (2025) conclude that people experience a stronger sense of agency over positive than negative outcomes, indexed by temporal compression. In this commentary, we evaluate that claim and identify several concerns about its validity. First, we argue that temporal compression effects should be standardized before being combined, because values in milliseconds are not necessarily comparable across different paradigms. When we analyzed standardized effects, evidence for a valence effect was absent once adjusting for publication bias. Second, we identified data integrity issues, identifying several studies that were included but either (1) did not manipulate outcome valence at all, or (2) contained only a positive or negative condition compared to a neutral condition. Excluding these studies meant that even unstandardized effects did not support Mariano et al.’s headline finding.

Vous pouvez rédiger un PREreview de No evidence that positive outcomes elicit a stronger sense of agency once correcting for publication bias: a commentary on, and re-analysis of, Mariano et al. (2025). Un PREreview est une évaluation d'un preprint et peut varier de quelques phrases à un rapport détaillé, semblable à un rapport d'évaluation par les pairs organisé par une revue.

Avant de commencer

Nous vous demanderons de vous connecter avec votre identifiant ORCID iD. Si vous n'en avez pas, vous pouvez en créer un.

Qu’est-ce qu’un ORCID iD ?

Un ORCID iD est un identifiant unique qui vous distingue de toute personne ayant le même nom ou nom similaire.

Commencer maintenant