Aller directement au contenu principal

Rédiger un PREreview

Exploring Open Science and Research Ethics in the Basic Sciences: Findings from a Qualitative Study

Publié
Serveur de preprints
MetaArXiv
DOI
10.31222/osf.io/98yds

New forms of questionable research practices (QRP) and even scientific misconduct practices are emerging in an open science environment. This work documents this transformation in three very different countries, Brazil, France, and Peru, using semi-structured interviews with researchers working in basic sciences: Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. The significant findings are that the hierarchical structure of academia contributes to the spread of research misconduct, and QRP and open science practices can potentially serve as effective tools for preventing and detecting these issues; however, it is the hierarchical structure of academia which undermines its effectivity as behaviours hiding misconducts go unnoticed. The main conclusion is that power relations between different actors in academia are still very present despite the countries' different ethical norms and the researchers' open science practices. The main recommendation is to work on aligning open science policies and policies on ethics and QRPs.

Vous pouvez rédiger un PREreview de Exploring Open Science and Research Ethics in the Basic Sciences: Findings from a Qualitative Study. Un PREreview est une évaluation d'un preprint et peut varier de quelques phrases à un rapport détaillé, semblable à un rapport d'évaluation par les pairs organisé par une revue.

Avant de commencer

Nous vous demanderons de vous connecter avec votre identifiant ORCID iD. Si vous n'en avez pas, vous pouvez en créer un.

Qu’est-ce qu’un ORCID iD ?

Un ORCID iD est un identifiant unique qui vous distingue de toute personne ayant le même nom ou nom similaire.

Commencer maintenant