Aller directement au contenu principal

Rédiger un PREreview

When Does Higher-Order Representation Improve Protein-Complex Recovery? A Leakage-Controlled, Matched-k Comparison of Graph and Penalized Hypergraph Spectral Clustering

Publié
Serveur de preprints
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202608.0397.v1

Group-level molecular-interaction evidence is often reduced to pairwise protein-protein interaction graphs before protein-complex detection, potentially discarding experiment membership and over-weighting large groups. Yet prior higher-order studies typically changed the representation, objective, output granularity, and evaluation protocol simultaneously. We isolate the operator-level contribution of higher-order representation by comparing an inverse-size-weighted clique graph, the normalized Zhou hypergraph operator, and a degree-aware penalized hypergraph operator on identical experiment-derived groups. Hyperedges were split by size into training, validation, and test sets; the training split alone defined the protein universe and operators; regularization was selected on validation data; and recovery was evaluated against held-out test hyperedges. Across nine IntAct-derived thematic PSI–MITAB collections and 25 paired initializations per dataset, the penalized hypergraph increased mean held-out symmetric best-match F1 on six datasets after within-dataset Benjamini–Hochberg correction, was indistinguishable on two, and was lower by 0.0015 on Cancer. Positive mean differences ranged from 0.0098 to 0.0356. However, the across-dataset Friedman test did not reach significance (χ2 = 5.20, p = 0.074), and the graph–penalized-hypergraph Nemenyi comparison was non-significant (p = 0.111). The penalized operator had the best mean rank (1.39), but secondary metrics and eigengap-selected cluster counts exposed dataset-dependent trade-offs. Observed recovery exceeded degree-preserving and hyperedge-size-preserving nulls on eight of nine datasets. Gene Ontology coherence was high for both representations, with no aspect-level difference surviving multiplicity correction and substantial pooled term overlap (Jaccard 0.78–0.86). Higher-order modeling is therefore conditionally beneficial rather than universally superior: it is most defensible when group membership is retained, regularization is validation-supported, and output granularity is controlled

Vous pouvez rédiger un PREreview de When Does Higher-Order Representation Improve Protein-Complex Recovery? A Leakage-Controlled, Matched-k Comparison of Graph and Penalized Hypergraph Spectral Clustering. Un PREreview est une évaluation d'un preprint et peut varier de quelques phrases à un rapport détaillé, semblable à un rapport d'évaluation par les pairs organisé par une revue.

Avant de commencer

Nous vous demanderons de vous connecter avec votre identifiant ORCID iD. Si vous n'en avez pas, vous pouvez en créer un.

Qu’est-ce qu’un ORCID iD ?

Un ORCID iD est un identifiant unique qui vous distingue de toute personne ayant le même nom ou nom similaire.

Commencer maintenant