Large language models (LLMs) increasingly require robust evaluation under realistic instruction-following conditions, particularly for fine-tuned task-specific adapters operating in multilingual environments. This study proposes a scenario-adaptive evaluation framework for assessing the reliability of fine-tuned text models across two application regimes: misinformation detection (disinfo) and knowledge-grounded factual biography generation (heroes). The framework integrates automated generation of balanced risk-oriented scenarios, bilingual evaluation in English and Ukrainian, the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm, and multidimensional robustness analysis through the Alignment Robustness Index (ARI). Six LoRA-adapted models based on Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct, and TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 were evaluated. The implemented pipeline generated 2052 scenarios and 6156 model responses, producing a final bilingual analytical subset of 4104 judged records. Experimental results show that task-specific adaptation produces task-dependent robustness profiles. In the disinfo case, Qwen2.5-3B achieved the strongest overall performance, combining the highest safety and classification accuracy. In contrast, the heroes case revealed a more compressed and multidimensional vulnerability space without a single dominant model. The results further demonstrate the importance of multilingual evaluation, as weaker adapters exhibited substantially larger cross-lingual safety gaps. Overall, the proposed framework provides a reproducible and practically applicable methodology for auditing fine-tuned language models under imperfect instructions.