- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
- Yes
- The introduction was clear and understandable.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
- Somewhat appropriate
- The statistics stated should be updated to recent times.
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
- Somewhat supported
- The claims stated in the study need more substantial evidence that will authenticate them and move the study from just a scholarly article to advocacy for the vulnerable population.
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
- Somewhat appropriate and clear
- How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
- Very clearly
- It is an intelligible and provocative study.
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
- Somewhat likely
- This preprint enlightens and engages the mind with vast perspectives but requires stronger evidence for claims
- Would it benefit from language editing?
- No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
- Yes, but it needs to be improved
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
- Yes, after minor changes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.