Saltar a PREreview
PREreview solicitada

PREreview estructurada del Data Security in AI Healthcare Applications: Challenges and Innovative Methods

Publicado
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18600768
Licencia
CC BY 4.0
Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
Yes
The introduction clearly explains the objective of the article in a comprehensive manner for better understanding of the general population.
Are the methods well-suited for this research?
Highly appropriate
They provided a stepwise review of the methodology, which helps in arriving at a valid conclusion.
Are the conclusions supported by the data?
Highly supported
Yes, the authors provided summaries of each article reviewed and logically derived the conclusion in a precise manner. They also highlighted the fundamental need for data security in healthcare settings.
Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
Highly appropriate and clear
The authors included clear visualizations of their data as discussed in the paper.
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
Very clearly
The authors illustrate the interpretation of their findings and areas for future research.
Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
Highly likely
The preprint outlines various methodologies and best options for healthcare data protection and predicting potential vulnerabilities.
Would it benefit from language editing?
No
The preprint has a few typographical errors, which do not impact the clarity of the paper.
Would you recommend this preprint to others?
Yes, it’s of high quality
It highlights information necessary to the advancement of technological knowledge, especially among the future generation.
Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
Yes, after minor changes
Minor typographical errors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.