Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) occurrence retrievals for an irregularly shaped region are limited by the API’s spatial query capabilities – rectangular envelopes or size/vertex-limited WKT polygons – neither of which conform to protected areas, sacred groves, wetlands, panchayat or municipal boundaries or any other arbitrary KML polygon of interest queried by users. This paper presents and validates an open, self-contained, adaptive spatial-tiling protocol that (i) ingests any KML polygon of any shape, size and location on earth, breaks it into a set of GBIF API-compatible rectangular tiles, (ii) queries, cleans and clips the individual records to the target polygon, and (iii) summarises the inventory with a generic diversity-completeness-rarefaction module, with minimal manual re-parameterisation between sites.
The protocol implements an iterative quadtree refinement algorithm that adapts tile number, size and location to the target polygon’s geometry, is combined with a fault-tolerant pagination/retry query system, a boundary-exact two-step clipping procedure and a Chao1-based completeness assessment to ensure statistical comparability between sites of different spatial extent and sampling intensity. The algorithm is implemented in open R source (sf, terra, rgbif, tidyverse) with the tiling algorithm controlled by the four parameters only (initial cell size, area floor, tile overlap threshold, recursion limit), with default settings on a new site by simply changing the input file path. This paper describes in detail its five main components – (i) polygon input and validation, (ii) quadtree adaptive tiling, (iii) polygon coverage verification, (iv) tile-wise GBIF query with retry/shrink pagination and partial data retention, (v) boundary-exact deduplication, clipping and diversity estimation.
A downstream generic module estimates diversity, Chao1 richness/completeness and Hurlbert’s rarefaction, for each taxonomic rank and generates rank-ordered diversity tables as output. The algorithm’s generalisability to multiple sites has been demonstrated with second polygon (Sonamukhi Sal forest dominated stretch, Bankura district, West Bengal; approx. 610 km 2 ) that differs from the first (Bishnupur Sal forest dominated stretch; 938 km 2 ) in both size and complexity (10 vs 34 KML vertices) and report the tiling and diversity metrics comparable results across the two polygons.
With no parameter changes, the algorithm generated 135 adaptive query tiles for Sal forest dominated stretch adjoining Bishnupur, and 86 tiles for Sal forest dominated stretch Sonamukhi SDFP, covering completely the area of both polygons. The number of tiles per 100 km 2 is comparable between the two runs (14.4 vs 14.1 tiles) despite the 35% difference in polygon size and 3.4× vertex count. The tile-wise querying with retry/shrink pagination retrieved 6,169 GBIF records (excluding errors) with boundary-exact clipping across 404 species for Bishnupur and 1,222 GBIF records (excluding errors) across 271 species for Sonamukhi; the generic diversity module processed the records without further parameter changes and generated comparable metrics for each rank at both sites.
The protocol addresses a general bioinformatic challenge in polygon-based GBIF queries, is provided as an open, reusable, documented method which has been validated on two sites. Because the protocol has so far been validated on only two polygons that differ markedly in size, shape and observer regime, it may be regarded as an initial cross-site validation rather than a comprehensive benchmark, and recommend testing on a broader, globally distributed set of polygons before the approach is treated as a general-purpose standard.