Saltar al contenido principal

Escribe una PREreview

Measure what the coarsening removes: a precondition for interpreting spatial-resolution comparisons in ecological models

Publicada
Servidor
EcoEvoRxiv
DOI
10.32942/x2zh5c

1. Ecological models increasingly use "scale-free" downscaled climate surfaces, assuming finer resolution predicts local response better. Even a comparison that varies resolution alone can fail to test it: over a small extent, coarsening barely changes the predictors. I give a diagnostic that detects this before any model is fitted, and calibrate it. 2. The comparison was built at two British Columbia extents: a low-relief municipality ~30 km across (153 corridor polygons x 4 summers) and a ~100 km valley transect spanning 4-1,920 m (300 forest stands x 4 summers). Model A used scale-free ClimateBC values at each polygon's location and elevation; Model B averaged those same variables within coarse cells. Both were random forests predicting a satellite water-stress index under spatially-blocked, polygon-grouped cross-validation. 3. At the municipal extent the comparison was unanswerable rather than null: coarsening to 4 km removed only 12.3% of the predictors' spatial variance, leaving them correlated at median r = 0.998. Over the transect it removed 48.4%, and the hypothesis was not supported at 25 km, at a power near one in four and at a cell size the label turns on. The coarse model was better on the point estimate (paired ΔRMSE = +0.00093, 95% CI [-0.00061, +0.00257]), but the interval spans zero at both cell sizes. Under blocking the direction favours the coarse model throughout; under random folds it reverses. R² was -0.138 for the fine model and +0.003 for the coarse. Terrain and stand structure together scored highest (CV R² = +0.029, positive in 80% of folds against climate's 40%), and adding climate made it worse. 4. Synthesis. A resolution hypothesis can be untestable while looking like a null result. Before interpreting any such comparison, measure the fraction of predictor spatial variance the coarsening destroys, and treat a low fraction as disqualifying rather than a finding. The rule holds in one direction only, since below f = 0.4 a null carries no information while above it detectability turns on the number of validation blocks as much as on f.

Puedes escribir una PREreview de Measure what the coarsening removes: a precondition for interpreting spatial-resolution comparisons in ecological models. Una PREreview es una revisión de un preprint y puede variar desde unas pocas oraciones hasta un extenso informe, similar a un informe de revisión por pares organizado por una revista.

Antes de comenzar

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Comenzar ahora