Write a comment

I encountered this article on PREreview. This manuscript got a very funny title on PREreview of

<p class="MDPI12title"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Why <span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-font-family: 等线; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">H<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">omes <span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-font-family: 等线; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">S<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">tay <span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-font-family: 等线; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">E<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">mpty: Understanding <span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-font-family: 等线; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-fareast; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">P<span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">roperty

The title shown on PREreview is not readable, it consists of mixed English, Chinese characters and many coding languages. The Chinese characters of 等线 are repeating. It is of simplified Chinese, if converted to traditional Chinese, it means 等線 . In English, it means equal line. Please revise the title to a readable one. Thank you.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.