Structured PREreview of Treatment Delays, Inappropriate First Intervention, Personal Protective Equipment Use, and Related Factors in Corneal Foreign Body Injuries as Occupational Accidents
- Published
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.17288107
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
- Yes
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
- Highly appropriate
- The statistical tests were listed out
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
- Somewhat supported
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
- Highly appropriate and clear
- How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?
- Somewhat clearly
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
- Moderately likely
- Would it benefit from language editing?
- No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
- Yes, it’s of high quality
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
- Yes, as it is
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The authors declare that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.