Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Refuting Continuous Unification: An Algorithmic Paradigm for Conductor Optimization in High-Frequency Regimes

Posted
Server
Zenodo
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.17386511

This record documents a negative result and an algorithmic alternative for conductor sizing in high-frequency regimes. We refute the hypothesis that a single closed-form “continuous unification” can yield the optimal conductor diameter across regimes. Through a numerical audit, four unified models (static p-norm, dynamic exponents, RF re-derived, and rule-based piecewise) are falsified against a multi-topology optimizer (“ground truth”), confirming that topology transitions (solid, Litz, hollow) cannot be captured by a smooth blend. The deposit includes the manuscript, figures, and supplementary files (audit CSV and code notes) to reproduce the reported error metrics

You can write a PREreview of Refuting Continuous Unification: An Algorithmic Paradigm for Conductor Optimization in High-Frequency Regimes. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now