الانتقال إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

اكتب مراجعة على PREreview

Weighing Faculty Research Contribution in Institutional Growth and Incentivization

نُشر
الخادم
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202503.1733.v1

Institutional rankings significantly influence higher education, research funding, and faculty incentives. In the Indian Ranking System (NIRF - Engineering Category), research parameters contribute 22.5%, directly impacting funding eligibility and institutional growth. Institutions struggle to quantify faculty research contributions for ranking and funding purposes. A standardized framework is required to evaluate and incentivize research outputs fairly. This study proposes a method for assigning weightage to authorship positions in collaborative publications, ensuring accurate faculty contribution assessment. To develop a fair and transparent author weightage system that supports institutional ranking calculations and incentive structures. A proportional weightage system is introduced, where the primary corresponding author and first author receives 50% credit, and the rest is distributed among co-authors. An incentive model based on journal quartiles and collaboration levels is proposed. The framework allows institutions to evaluate faculty contributions systematically, aiding in ranking, funding, and incentives. Future modifications can integrate SDG-focused research, corporate collaborations, and international partnerships for enhanced impact.

يمكنك كتابة مراجعة PREreview لـ Weighing Faculty Research Contribution in Institutional Growth and Incentivization. مراجعة PREreview هي مراجعة لمسودة بحثية أولية، ويمكن أن تتراوح بين بضع جمل وتقرير مطوّل، على غرار تقرير مراجعة الأقران الذي تنظمه المجلات العلمية.

قبل أن تبدأ

سنطلب منك تسجيل الدخول باستخدام معرّف ORCID الخاص بك. إذا لم يكن لديك معرّف، يمكنك إنشاء واحد.

ما هو معرّف ORCID؟

يُعدّ معرّف ORCID معرّفًا فريدًا يميّزك عن كل من يحمل اسمًا مطابقًا أو مشابهًا لاسمك.

ابدأ الآن