Structured PREreview of Female Signatories and Peace Durability: Replicating Krause, Krause, and Bränfors (2018)

Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?

Yes

Are the methods well-suited for this research?

Somewhat appropriate

Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Somewhat supported

Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?

Somewhat appropriate and clear

How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for the research?

Very clearly

Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?

Somewhat likely

Would it benefit from language editing?

Yes

Specifically the SD

Would you recommend this preprint to others?

Yes, but it needs to be improved

Before being regarded as a polished final paper, I believe the manuscript would benefit from some changes, especially addressing the power analysis, tightening some of the methodological and bibliographic details, and verifying the numerical inconsistencies in the descriptive statistics.

Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?

Yes, after minor changes

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The author declares that they did not use generative AI to come up with new ideas for their review.