PREreview of Theory of Differences Between Elements: Explanation of the Differences Between Quantum Physics and the Theory of General Relativity

This paper presents a thoughtful and ambitious proposal—the Theory of Differences Between Elements—as a means to explain the fundamental differences between quantum physics and the theory of general relativity. The author argues that these differences arise from three key factors: the specific composition of elements, the reactions they undergo, and the intensity of physical influences such as temperature or force. These three aspects are used to explain why different elements exhibit different physical behaviors and why the physical laws of the microscopic and macroscopic worlds are not universally the same.

The work stands out for its accessible style and wide range of examples drawn from chemistry, biology, and planetary science. Through illustrations such as chemical reactions, changes of state, and structural organization in living beings, the author shows how physical characteristics emerge from interactions and compositions. This allows readers to grasp complex ideas through familiar phenomena.

The central claim is that quantum physics and general relativity are not conflicting, but are distinct due to the differing nature of the elements and scales they describe. The theory challenges the search for a single unifying theory, suggesting instead that the laws of physics are inherently dependent on elemental structure and contextual interactions.

This perspective invites readers to re-examine long-held assumptions about universality in physics and offers a philosophical framework grounded in observable differences in nature.

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Define terms like “intensity of physical concept” more clearly using specific physical examples.

2. Add a concise summary of the main theoretical points early in the paper for better structure.

3. Reduce repeated explanations to improve flow and focus.

4. Clearly define the boundary between quantum and relativistic domains using standard physics language.

5. Briefly mention major unification attempts (e.g., string theory) to situate the theory in context.

6. Refine formatting, improve figure captions, and correct grammatical issues for better presentation.

7. If possible, include a minimal mathematical framework to support key relationships.

Conclusion

This is a creative and original contribution that encourages deeper reflection on the nature of physical laws. By focusing on composition, interaction, and physical conditions, it offers a grounded explanation for why quantum physics and general relativity differ. The theory brings forward a fresh viewpoint and deserves attention, further refinement, and open discussion in the field of theoretical physics.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.