PREreview of Exploration of Alternative Interpretation Approaches to the Physical Mechanism of Electron Double-Slit Interference

This paper presents a courageous and well-structured reinterpretation of the electron double-slit interference experiment. Instead of attributing the interference pattern to the wave-particle duality of electrons, it proposes a deterministic explanation based on periodic Coulomb force fields within the slit material. This approach is rooted in classical physics, supported by clear logic, and expressed through simplified but consistent mathematical analysis.

The authors highlight an often-overlooked element in quantum experiments—the microscopic physical environment. By focusing on how solid-state structure may influence electron trajectories, the paper introduces a fresh direction for understanding interference, one that does not rely on abstract assumptions like wavefunction collapse or observer-induced behavior.

The manuscript is notable for applying scientific criteria such as falsifiability, logical consistency, and experimental verifiability. It challenges long-standing assumptions without rejecting the framework of modern physics, offering instead a complementary and physically motivated viewpoint that encourages experimental follow-up.

This is a serious and thought-provoking contribution that deserves attention. It represents the spirit of scientific progress: questioning accepted views through grounded reasoning and proposing new, testable ideas.

Suggestions

1. Add quantitative predictions for how different slit materials may affect fringe spacing or contrast.

2. Define experimental conditions needed to isolate the effects of fluctuating Coulomb fields.

3. Improve figures with labeled axes, units, and clearer captions to enhance understanding.

4. Clarify differences between this approach and other models like pilot-wave theory.

5. Detail the Casimir force proposal as a supporting line of experimental verification.

6. Polish grammar and flow to strengthen clarity and academic presentation.

7. Mention earlier reinterpretations of interference to place this work in historical context.

Conclusion

This work reopens the discussion on the foundations of quantum mechanics with clarity and purpose. It proposes a physically grounded, logically sound, and potentially verifiable alternative that enriches the ongoing search for deeper understanding. It invites both theorists and experimentalists to look again—with sharper focus—at one of the most important experiments in physics.

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.