- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- The topic and the introduction are well aligned. The introduction explains the broader perspective of the topic and streams it down to the existing gap and shows the researchers' objective of the study.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Highly appropriate
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Somewhat supported
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Highly appropriate and clear
-
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for
the research?
-
Very clearly
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Highly likely
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, but it needs to be improved
- We recommend that the preprint should be presented in the common standard format to make it easy to follow, i.e. abstract, introduction, methodologies, results, discussion/conclusion, etc.
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, after minor changes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.