Write a comment

The article provides an in-depth exploration of a critical area of urban planning in Jordan, highlighting the intersection of gender and public space utilization. Its strengths lie in its qualitative methodology and rich thematic analysis. Minor adjustments in structure and clarity, along with a more visual representation of data, could enhance its impact.

This work advances the field by highlighting the importance of integrating gender considerations into urban policy and planning, thereby advocating for sustainable and inclusive urban environments that enhance the well-being of all residents, particularly women. The findings serve as a call to action for urban planners and policymakers to develop strategies that create equitable access to UGS, fostering a more inclusive urban experience.

Major issues

Limited Representation: The research may not encompass the experiences of all women, particularly those from diverse backgrounds, potentially overlooking unique challenges faced by marginalized groups.

Policy Impact: There may be a gap in translating the research findings into actionable policy changes, limiting the potential for real-world impact

Minor issues

Clarity in Terminology: The use of specific terms related to urban planning and gender studies could be better defined for clarity, especially for readers unfamiliar with the field.

Structure of Findings: A clearer organization of key findings might improve readability, such as categorizing barriers by type (cultural, infrastructural, safety).

Recommendations Section: A dedicated section outlining specific, actionable recommendations for urban planners could improve the practical applicability of the research conclusions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.