- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- The introduction states "We examined whether mobile phone-based text messages that leveraged behavioural science principles promoted timely clinic attendance among ART recipients" which clearly explains what the objective is.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Somewhat appropriate
- They did not have a control who received no text messages to compare to for the randomized control trials.
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Somewhat supported
- It was concluded that the reminder messages did not increase timely clinic visits but among those who recently started ART, loss aversion framing increased timely visits. I feel that this is somewhat supported as they don't have a control that received no text messages which makes it hard to really know if these results make an actual difference.
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Somewhat appropriate and clear
- The table at the end of the preprint nicely summarizes the results. However, the data analysis section could've been more detailed
-
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for
the research?
-
Very clearly
- They provided detailed explanations for their results.
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Moderately likely
- This preprint is a start as it does show how applying behavioral science principles can influence the way healthcare is delivered. However, the limitations make the results a bit weak which makes it not as reliable.
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, but it needs to be improved
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, after minor changes
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.