- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- It clearly describes how the pearl has dual roles in resisting SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complications.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Somewhat appropriate
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Highly supported
- Their conclusions are supported. Their figures show how the study was conducted and results match the conclusion.
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Somewhat appropriate and clear
-
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for
the research?
-
Neither clearly nor unclearly
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Somewhat likely
- This pearl could be a scientific advancements to treat COVID infections.
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, it’s of high quality
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, as it is
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.