- Does the introduction explain the objective of the research presented in the preprint?
-
Yes
- The introduction clearly states the research question of the preprint and also provides background knowledge on the topic.
- Are the methods well-suited for this research?
-
Highly appropriate
- The methods of this study are well laid out and include an appropriate sample size, length of observation, testing methods, and integration of appropriate outside data (US census).
- Are the conclusions supported by the data?
-
Highly supported
- The outcome of the research demonstrating that "HIV incidence is higher among non-migrating persons with migrant spouses, especially men. Targeted HIV testing and prevention interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis could be considered for those with migrant spouses", is highly supported by the method's results.
- Are the data presentations, including visualizations, well-suited to represent the data?
-
Highly appropriate and clear
- Yes, all results and key patterns in the data are clearly communicated.
-
How clearly do the authors discuss, explain, and interpret their findings and potential next steps for
the research?
-
Very clearly
- Yes, the authors discuss, explain and interpret their findings multiple times, very clearly. Additionally, they pose further steps in stating "targeted HIV testing and prevention interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis could be considered for men with migrant spouses".
- Is the preprint likely to advance academic knowledge?
-
Highly likely
- Yes, this research will help decrease HIV prevalence in households where one spouse is migrating.
- Would it benefit from language editing?
-
No
- The language is clear.
- Would you recommend this preprint to others?
-
Yes, it’s of high quality
- The research is robust and the findings are clearly communicated.
- Is it ready for attention from an editor, publisher or broader audience?
-
Yes, as it is
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.