Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

Observer Disagreement, Predictive Scale, and a Stable Component-Change Law in Conway's Game of Life

Posted
Server
Zenodo
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19236397

Different coarse-grained descriptions of the same deterministic system can yield different measured changes. Using a component-count fine observer and an occupied-block coarse observer, we establish three empirical regularities in Conway’s Game of Life. Early component net change predicts the full-run normalized narrative gap between observers with partial correlation r = −0.848 (95% bootstrap CI [−0.862, −0.830], N = 1000), sharpening after density control. The predictive scale that best forecasts a future observable depends on which observable: time-averaged live-cell count peaks at an intermediate scale (B = 2) while occupied-block count peaks at its own native scale (B = 8), with non-overlapping bootstrap confidence intervals. A linear law linking embedded isolated cells to future component-level decline is stable across six size-by-density conditions (mean slope ≈ −1.52, CV ≈ 0.09). Two stronger mechanism claims—global mediation through component net change, and residual coupling beyond death and local neighbourhood dynamics—do not survive their pre-specified tests. All results are established computationally within GoL; generalisation beyond this system remains an open empirical question.

You can write a PREreview of Observer Disagreement, Predictive Scale, and a Stable Component-Change Law in Conway's Game of Life. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now