Write a PREreview

The Hodgkin--Huxley model has provided an extraordinarily successful phenomenological description of the action potential for over seven decades. Its predictive power and mathematical elegance have made it a cornerstone of modern neuroscience. However, the model incorporates mechanistic assumptions about the nanoscale ionic environment of the axonal membrane that were necessarily simplified in 1952 and that modern biophysics allows us to examine critically. In this article, we identify eight independent physical inconsistencies in the mechanistic interpretation of the Hodgkin--Huxley model. These concern: the gel-phase nature of the axoplasm and its consequences for ionic activity; the insufficient ionic reservoir of the peri-membrane volume; the physical implausibility of ionic replenishment at physiological firing rates; ionic congestion and inter-species competition in confined spaces; the reductive representation of ion channels as single conductance parameters; the uncertain relationship between crystallographic channel structures and physiological reality; the osmotic paradox created by intra-pore ionic concentrations; and the systematic physical limitations of patch-clamp recordings. None of these arguments contests the experimental measurements on which the model is based. All of them contest the physical plausibility of the mechanistic interpretation placed on these measurements. The cumulative and mutually reinforcing nature of these inconsistencies suggests that the mechanistic foundations of the Hodgkin--Huxley model deserve serious and systematic reexamination.