We’ve recently replaced Rapid PREreviews with Structured PREreviews.
You can write a Structured PREreview now.
We’ll be updating older Rapid PREreviews like these soon.
| Question | Yes | Unsure | N/A | No |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are the findings novel? | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the results likely to lead to future research? | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Is sufficient detail provided to allow reproduction of the study? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Are the methods and statistics appropriate for the analysis? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Are the principal conclusions supported by the data and analysis? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Does the manuscript discuss limitations? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Have the authors adequately discussed ethical concerns? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Does the manuscript include new data? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the data used in the manuscript available? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Is the code used in the manuscript available? | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Would you recommend this manuscript to others? | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| Do you recommend this manuscript for peer review? | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
This review has been formulated based on my brief comment posted on Pubpeer.
https://pubpeer.com/publications/030D11C6AA3F20092C564B6599BFE1#
In this preprint, Tsuji et al. deal with an interesting topic of aging and sleep and also present a great deal of data. However, in the current version, there …