We haven’t yet added the form to the new version of PREreview as we’re looking to improve how Rapid PREreviews work; if you could help, please get in touch.
| Question | Yes | Unsure | N/A | No |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are the findings novel? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the results likely to lead to future research? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Is sufficient detail provided to allow reproduction of the study? | 0% | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| Are the methods and statistics appropriate for the analysis? | 20% | 20% | 0% | 60% |
| Are the principal conclusions supported by the data and analysis? | 40% | 0% | 0% | 60% |
| Does the manuscript discuss limitations? | 20% | 0% | 0% | 80% |
| Have the authors adequately discussed ethical concerns? | 40% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
| Does the manuscript include new data? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the data used in the manuscript available? | 0% | 20% | 0% | 80% |
| Is the code used in the manuscript available? | 40% | 0% | 60% | 0% |
| Would you recommend this manuscript to others? | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
| Do you recommend this manuscript for peer review? | 60% | 0% | 0% | 40% |
The following PREreview results from a live-streamed discussion which took place on September 22, 2020 between Jonny Coates, Karen Eddleman, Monica Granados, Emily Lescak, Phrasia Mapfumo, Mafalda Pimentel, and Daniela Saderi.
General preprint assessment