Skip to main content

Write a PREreview

A Critical Analysis of Dietetics – Part 1: Elemental Ratios, Sulphur, and Nitrogen

Posted
Server
Preprints.org
DOI
10.20944/preprints202504.0571.v1

Historically, generalised dietary recommendations have failed to accommodate individual biochemical needs, particularly within Indigenous populations, whose traditional diets differ significantly from modern nutritional norms. This critical analysis explores how core elements, nitrogen, phosphorus, oxygen, sulphur, and carbon, interact within human physiology, influencing epigenetic regulation, metabolic balance, and disease outcomes. Drawing on historical dietary patterns and recent insights from molecular biology, this paper challenges conventional views on nutritional deficiencies and red meat carcinogenicity. It highlights the potential for nitrogen-dense, carnivorous diets to support metabolic health in certain groups, and the need to account for sulphur load in evaluating modern dietary risks. The findings advocate for a shift toward elemental and evolution-informed nutritional frameworks, laying the groundwork for precision healthcare that integrates personal, cultural, and environmental factors into dietary planning.

You can write a PREreview of A Critical Analysis of Dietetics – Part 1: Elemental Ratios, Sulphur, and Nitrogen. A PREreview is a review of a preprint and can vary from a few sentences to a lengthy report, similar to a journal-organized peer-review report.

Before you start

We will ask you to log in with your ORCID iD. If you don’t have an iD, you can create one.

What is an ORCID iD?

An ORCID iD is a unique identifier that distinguishes you from everyone with the same or similar name.

Start now